Comparative Effects of Oral Clonidine and Pregabalin Premedication on Postoperative Recovery After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Study
Keywords:
Post-operative Recovery; Clonidine; Pregabalin; Pain Management; Hemodynamic Stability; Sedation; Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; Premedication; Visual Analogue Scale; Ramsay Sedation ScoreAbstract
Background: Post-operative recovery optimization remains a crucial aspect of modern anesthetic practice. This study compared the effects of oral clonidine versus pregabalin premedication on post-operative recovery profiles. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 75 ASA I patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive either oral clonidine 5μg/kg (n=25), pregabalin 150mg (n=25), or placebo (n=25) before surgery. Post-operative parameters including pain scores, sedation levels, hemodynamic stability, and analgesic requirements were monitored for 4 hours. Results: Pregabalin demonstrated superior pain control with 100% of patients maintaining VAS ≤4 versus 72% in clonidine and 24% in placebo groups (p<0.001). Clonidine provided better hemodynamic stability, maintaining lower heart rates (71.00±3.51 vs 83.20±5.76 beats/min in placebo, p<0.001) and mean arterial pressure (82.64±2.30 vs 93.60±6.61 mmHg in placebo, p<0.001) at 240 minutes. Sedation patterns differed significantly, with pregabalin showing deeper sedation (RSS 3 in 88%) compared to clonidine (RSS 2 in 96%). Conclusion: Both medications demonstrated distinct advantages in different aspects of recovery, suggesting the need for individualized premedication selection based on specific recovery priorities.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of first publication.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





